The theme was renamed Zibll/子比 → AKSRT → Jio, but upstream branding survived the sweeps in CSS classes, the SVG sprite prefix, a persisted widget field ID, JS events, admin Vue class names, test infrastructure and docblocks. Renames: - zib-widget / zib-widget-wrap / zib-slider → jio-widget-box / jio-widget-box-wrap / jio-slider-box (jio-widget is taken by the modern widget shell, jio-box-* by the card primitives) - zib-partners-scroll + zps-* → jio-partners-scroll + jps-* - zib-combo-info-card + zci-* → jio-combo-info-card + jci-* - zibsvg- → jiosvg-, including the exported picker helpers and the fa-zibsvg- family-prefix guard - zibpay_type → pay_type; the dual-read fallback in PostQuery collapses to a single key - [zibajax="submit"] dropped (no PHP emitter); zib_ajax.success → jio_ajax.success - aks-* admin Vue classes → jio-* - zib_palette() → palette() User-facing vendor traces are gone: the floating "more" button default no longer ships a zibll.com link or 子比主题 marketing copy, the notice widget ships no preset promo entries, and the four 官网教程 links are removed from the post-list admin schema. Test infrastructure renamed to neutral names (docker-compose.reference.yml, Caddyfile, article-baseline.json, modern-widgets-contract.test.cjs) with their DB/volume/env/slug identifiers following. Kept intentionally, documented in tests/fixtures/README.md: the golden fixture reference fingerprint (a SHA-256 record of an external directory, read by validate-widget-golden / generate-widget-golden-fixture / audit-widget-system), the doesNotMatch guards that prove the old tokens are gone, and the reference theme's own meta key in the visual fixtures. No backward-compat or data migration: saved widget configs holding old icon keys or the old field ID silently lose them, per the project's rewrite-over-compatibility rule. Verified: 132/132 node contract tests, php tests/widget-system/run.php (146 assertions), audit-admin-contracts, audit-psr4-paths and validate-widget-golden all green; tracked bundles regenerated and in sync. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
121 lines
6.9 KiB
JavaScript
121 lines
6.9 KiB
JavaScript
/**
|
||
* 余额充值弹窗壳契约(第 19 轮参考主题对齐 + 第 21 轮全页不可点击回归护栏)。
|
||
*
|
||
* 关键约束:本主题的弹窗壳是服务端静态输出,与按需创建弹窗壳的运行时方案
|
||
* (其 CSS 无 bootstrap .modal 基础规则)架构不同。若弹窗壳在
|
||
* 静止态没有被显式隐藏,main.css 的 .flex{display:flex}(后加载、与
|
||
* bootstrap.min.css 的 .modal{display:none} 同特异性、后者胜)会让
|
||
* `class="modal flex jc fade"` 壳永久 display:flex 铺满全屏,叠加 .fade
|
||
* 的 opacity:0 形成隐形遮罩 → 整页所有按钮不可点击(2026-09-17 实测故障)。
|
||
*
|
||
* 因此 credits.css 必须以 (0,2,0) 特异性压制:
|
||
* .modal[data-jio-charge-modal] { display: none; }
|
||
* .modal[data-jio-charge-modal].in { display: flex; }
|
||
* 展示态由 credits.js 自包含开关的内联 display:flex 驱动(不依赖
|
||
* jQuery/Bootstrap 运行时;block 会破坏 .flex.jc 双轴居中——
|
||
* .modal.flex .modal-dialog{margin:0} 在 block 下使对话框顶在左上角),
|
||
* 关闭后内联样式撤除即回到隐藏规则。
|
||
*/
|
||
const test = require('node:test');
|
||
const assert = require('node:assert');
|
||
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
||
const path = require('node:path');
|
||
|
||
const root = path.join(__dirname, '..', '..');
|
||
const read = (...seg) => fs.readFileSync(path.join(root, ...seg), 'utf8');
|
||
|
||
const wallet = read('inc', 'helpers', 'user-center-renderers', 'credits-wallet.php');
|
||
const creditsJs = read('assets', 'js', 'credits.js');
|
||
const creditsCss = read('assets', 'css', 'routes', 'user-center', 'credits.css');
|
||
const balanceRest = read('src', 'Credits', 'BalanceServiceRest.php');
|
||
|
||
test('弹窗壳为静态服务端渲染壳并带 data 钩子', () => {
|
||
assert.match(wallet, /class="modal flex jc fade"[^>]*data-jio-charge-modal/);
|
||
assert.match(wallet, /data-jio-charge-form/);
|
||
assert.match(wallet, /data-dismiss="modal"/);
|
||
assert.match(wallet, /initiate-pay/);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('弹窗壳静止态必须被 credits.css 显式隐藏(.flex 覆盖回归护栏)', () => {
|
||
// (0,2,0) 特异性压制 main.css 的 .flex{display:flex}。
|
||
assert.match(creditsCss, /\.modal\[data-jio-charge-modal\]\s*\{\s*display:\s*none;/);
|
||
// 打开态必须是 flex 而非 block:.modal.flex .modal-dialog{margin:0} 在
|
||
// block 下使对话框顶在左上角(无头 Chrome 几何实证),flex 下由壳的
|
||
// .flex.jc 双轴居中(生产环境即此形态)。
|
||
assert.match(creditsCss, /\.modal\[data-jio-charge-modal\]\.in\s*\{\s*display:\s*flex;/);
|
||
assert.doesNotMatch(creditsCss, /\.modal\[data-jio-charge-modal\]\.in\s*\{\s*display:\s*block;/);
|
||
// 购买积分弹窗壳同构(服务端静态输出 .modal.flex.jc.fade),静止态同样
|
||
// 必须显式隐藏,否则隐形遮罩拦截整页点击(2026-09-18 实测回归)。
|
||
const balance = read('inc', 'helpers', 'user-center-renderers', 'credits-balance.php');
|
||
assert.match(balance, /class="modal flex jc fade"[^>]*data-jio-points-pay-modal/);
|
||
assert.match(creditsCss, /\.modal\[data-jio-points-pay-modal\]\s*\{\s*display:\s*none;/);
|
||
assert.match(creditsCss, /\.modal\[data-jio-points-pay-modal\]\.in\s*\{\s*display:\s*flex;/);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('开关自包含:不依赖 jQuery/Bootstrap modal 运行时', () => {
|
||
assert.match(creditsJs, /function openChargeModal/);
|
||
assert.match(creditsJs, /function closeChargeModal/);
|
||
assert.match(creditsJs, /data-jio-charge-open/);
|
||
// 动态创建遮罩层(bootstrap.min.css 已有 .modal-backdrop 规则)。
|
||
assert.match(creditsJs, /modal-backdrop fade in/);
|
||
// 充值弹窗开关不得回退到 jQuery modal 运行时(时序异常时弹窗打不开)。
|
||
assert.doesNotMatch(creditsJs, /\.modal\(\s*['"]show['"]/);
|
||
assert.doesNotMatch(creditsJs, /hidden\.bs\.modal/);
|
||
// 打开前移除旧缓存 hidden 标记;关闭走 300ms fade-out 收尾。
|
||
assert.match(creditsJs, /removeAttribute\('hidden'\)/);
|
||
assert.match(creditsJs, /void modal\.offsetWidth/);
|
||
// 打开态内联 display 必须是 flex(block 会破坏 .flex.jc 双轴居中)。
|
||
assert.match(creditsJs, /modal\.style\.display = 'flex'/);
|
||
assert.doesNotMatch(creditsJs, /modal\.style\.display = 'block'/);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* 余额充值提交契约(预设档位被 REST 参数层拦截的回归护栏)。
|
||
*
|
||
* custom_price 只在 package=custom 时被消费,选中预设档位时前端必带该键且值为
|
||
* 空串。WP REST 的 default 仅在「键完全缺失」时生效:键存在而值为空串时 default
|
||
* 不参与,空串直接进 pattern 校验 → 请求在参数层就被拦下(rest_invalid_param
|
||
* 「无效参数:custom_price」),业务回调根本不执行。
|
||
*
|
||
* 因此参数声明只保留 type/default/清洗,金额格式与区间的唯一裁决留在
|
||
* create_charge_order()(AssetAmount::balance + custom_limit 区间校验)。
|
||
*/
|
||
test('充值请求参数:custom_price 空串放行,金额格式只由业务层裁决', () => {
|
||
const chargeRoute = balanceRest.slice(
|
||
balanceRest.indexOf("'/pay/balance/charge'"),
|
||
balanceRest.indexOf("'/pay/transfer'"),
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(chargeRoute, /'custom_price'\s*=>\s*\['type'\s*=>\s*'string',\s*'default'\s*=>\s*''/);
|
||
assert.doesNotMatch(
|
||
chargeRoute,
|
||
/custom_price'[\s\S]*?'pattern'/,
|
||
'custom_price must not carry a second amount rule: the empty string is a valid "not applicable" value',
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
const createCallback = balanceRest.slice(
|
||
balanceRest.indexOf('public function rest_charge_create'),
|
||
balanceRest.indexOf('public function rest_transfer'),
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(createCallback, /\$custom_price\s*=\s*\(string\) \$request->get_param\('custom_price'\)/);
|
||
assert.match(createCallback, /\$payment_method\s*=\s*\(string\) \$request->get_param\('payment_method'\)/);
|
||
// 手工重读请求体会让声明的 default/sanitize_callback 形同虚设(第二套取值口径)。
|
||
assert.doesNotMatch(createCallback, /get_json_params\(\)|->get_params\(\)/);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('充值弹窗:选中预设档位清空自定义金额,提交路径无重复读取', () => {
|
||
// 选中预设档位即放弃自定义金额;否则输入框里残留的数字会在提交时按「合法自定义
|
||
// 金额」把 package 顶回 custom,用户刚点的档位被静默忽略。
|
||
assert.match(creditsJs, /if \(value !== 'custom' && customInput\) \{[\s\S]{0,60}customInput\.value = '';/);
|
||
// 支付方式在提交处理器开头已读取,选档位不会改动它,故充值弹窗内只应存在一处读取
|
||
// (积分购买弹窗是同构的另一套初始化,各自一处,不在此断言范围)。
|
||
const chargeInit = creditsJs.slice(
|
||
creditsJs.indexOf('function initBalanceCharge'),
|
||
creditsJs.indexOf('function initTransfer'),
|
||
);
|
||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||
[...chargeInit.matchAll(/form\.querySelector\('input\[name="payment_method"\]'\)/g)].length,
|
||
1,
|
||
'the submit handler must not re-read payment_method (dead duplicate guard)',
|
||
);
|
||
});
|